Theory of
Planetary Diaspora
By
Michael J. Zabrana
Abstract:
While
reviewing the trajectory of a planet, following the sudden
death of its star, it becomes apparent that the widely
accepted resultant trajectory paths, as proposed by Isaac
Newton & Albert Einstein respectively, are both based solely
on the theoretical removal of gravitational pull. This
theory proposes that instant removal of Gravity caused by
the death of a star, only happens when the death is due to
an explosion, which brings about instant change.
Furthermore, the consequences of this celestial event bring
other factors into effect, which substantially alter the
accepted trajectory of any surviving planet, in a manner,
hitherto not presented.
Full Text:
A theorem
is proposed in respect of, so far, widely overlooked
resultant effects on planets contained within a previously
balanced solar system, once sudden death of its star occurs.
As theoretical expectations already propose, if we assume
the removal of a star from its solar system, motion of the
planets contained within reach of the gravitational pull of
that star will cease to exist in its previously balanced
form causing each of the planets to leave their orbit
comparatively soon after the actual event. However, a
serious problem is noted with this physical assumption, as
it is clearly not reasonably acceptable to assume removal of
a star, therefore instant termination of its gravitational
effects on its planets without taking into consideration all
forces acting in the process and providing exact physical
effects unavoidably linked with such an event. It is stated
that one can reasonably assume removal of a star from a
solar system only if either of two specific cosmological
events take place. These are: Sudden Death of a Star, caused
by the catastrophic imbalance of its previously stable
nuclear burning process and Sudden Death of a Star, caused
by an impact with another cosmological object of comparative
size and mass. Both these events are without question
accompanied by an unavoidable explosion of immense magnitude
and it is further noted that the processes, effects, and
consequences in both cases are not identical. This theory is
fully concerned with the first of these events and for the
purpose of lesser complexity disregards the second
cosmological event, and its exact physical implications,
although they are clearly related.
Some
scientific opinions presented to date apparently indicate
that planets contained within a solar system, which has
undergone the above-mentioned event, would be totally
consumed, and destroyed in the process. It is proposed that
sudden death of a star may consume and completely destroy
only planets in closest proximity to the exploded star,
which also depends upon their size, mass, and composition.
Nonetheless, even this assumption cannot be taken as an
absolute physical certainty. In this specific case, the
resultant kinetic motion of a planet is not governed
exclusively by the trajectory of its orbit at the moment in
time when the ripples in space caused by the lack of
Gravity, as presented by Albert Einstein, reach the planet,
but additionally, by the force of the star exploding.
Therefore, both directional vectors, as proposed
respectively by Isaac Newton & later amended by Albert
Einstein, which would have been in each differing respective
case followed by the “released” planet from the star’s
gravitational pull, in fact do not apply. A third solution
for this specific physical situation presents itself clearly
when one chooses not to ignore the self-evident secondary
interacting force, caused by the star exploding. This force
will inevitably act on each planet, or any other object,
contained within the solar system in varying manner,
dependant on the planet’s size, mass, trajectory at the time
of impact, and distance from the formerly balanced star.
This will not only substantially alter the planet’s
resultant trajectory path, from that suggested by both Isaac
Newton & then amended by Albert Einstein, but will also
significantly increase the previous velocity that the planet
was moving at. This applies when the star explodes, the
previously stable solar system seizes to exist, and on
immediate release of the planet from Gravity, and forms,
along with the gravitational ripple effect, the basis for
the correct calculations.
It is
expected that once a planet is “ejected”, released, from the
previously stable solar system due to the effect of a so
instant and massive force created by the sudden death of a
star, combined with the absence of gravitational pull of its
star, it will follow a new directional vector through space,
which is likely to result in a further collision with any
cosmological object in its new path at some time in the
future. Alternatively, it may progress safely through all
“barriers” only to find another solar system on its path
through space, where it may come under gravitational pull of
another star, thus may find itself stabilised in a new
balanced situation. The chance of collision with its own
neighbouring planets contained in its originating solar
system, is in this case almost insignificant due to
comparatively low number of planetary alignments in one
year, if one takes our own solar system as an example. It
may of course also experience complete destruction by coming
into a reach of a black hole. It is further presumed that
some of the so far observed events indicative of previous
massive explosions in space may in fact originate from these
inter-planetary collisions, and may not therefore represent
at least in some cases the so far suggested explanations. It
can be safely assumed that many of the to date unknown, as
well as known and observed asteroids, meteorites, and other
celestial debris contained within space may have been
created precisely by some of these impacts due to planets
having been violently ejected from their previously stable
positions within solar systems. It is also conceivable that
a planet, which previously contained various striving forms
of life, may loose its capability to sustain any of its life
forms over a varying span of time, completely. However, it
may also on the other hand become a planet containing only
faint reminiscence of its previous life forms, dormant life
forms, or mutations thereof. Alternatively, when taking into
consideration an example of a planet previously without any
forms of life, under certain circumstances, a new stable
position in a foreign solar system may actually result in
creation of life for the first time. Success of any such
eventuality is understandably dependant on the new situation
in time, stability, distance from the new star, resultant
temperature, absence or abundance of water, in comparison to
those, which were in effect prior to the sudden death of the
star when that particular planet was still located in stable
orbit, in its own solar system, prior to subsequent
dispersal of all planets in multiple directions into space,
along the horizontal axis of that particular solar system.
According
to Albert Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity, we are
lead to accept that, once a star is removed from its central
position in a solar system, its orbiting planets, including
their potential moons, will be affected by this sudden lack
of gravitational pull, not instantly, as Isaac Newton
proposed. Rather once the ripples in space, created by the
instant lack of gravitational pull of the star, reaches each
respective planet after transcending the distance between
the, now non-existent, star and each respective planet of
that solar system. Only then would therefore this event
allow each respective planet to release itself, totally,
from its orbital position. This release, according to Albert
Einstein, should be delayed and show itself in a slight bow
like manner, represented by the gradual decrease of Gravity
according to “waves” in arriving ripples through space. At
that moment, the termination of the star’s Gravity pull on
the planet is imminent. In contrast, Isaac Newton’s Laws of
Planetary Motion lead us to accept that sudden termination
of gravitational pull, (“removal of a star from its solar
system”), will affect planets contained within that
particular solar system instantly, causing their immediate
release from original orbital positions around the now
non-existent star. Their new directions through space would
thus depend solely on the precise moment in time when the
seizure of the gravitational pull of the star occurred due
to its theoretical removal.
It is
proposed that the acceptance of related theories and laws as
presented by both distinguished gentlemen in their time as
faultless, is no longer conceivable. Re-evaluation and
subsequent necessary amendments are therefore proposed in
respect of both Isaac Newton’s Law of Gravity, and Albert
Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity, as it is obvious
that neither apply in this specific physical event. In
applied physics terms, a sudden termination of balanced
gravitational relationship between a star and its orbiting
planets can occur solely due to circumstances given by the
above-stated examples, while the actual seizure of the
gravitational pull resultant from such an event cannot be
considered as the main governing aspect. This is due to the
unavoidable fact that there is evidently more than one
acting force in effect. The resultant motion of the planets
at this specific moment in time is governed by two major
contributing forces, one of which has been, to date, ignored
completely.
The main,
and prevailing force, which will affect the post star
explosion planetary motion, is first and foremost, the
actual resultant force of the exploding star. It is proposed
that this force must be considered as interlinked part of a
pair of forces acting in different directions, where only
one of these is expressed as the, so far accounted for,
directional change in planetary motion caused by the
imminent lack of Gravity. It is also apparent that both
these forces are proportionate towards each other in all
cases, no matter what mass, or size of the star that has
seized to exist in its previously stable form. The force
represented by the exploding star will be dispersed
relatively equally throughout the “near” space, until it
will become deformed in sections by obstructing objects,
(planets, etc.). It can be basically divided into equal
force values assigned to every single possible vector
originating from an exact point in space, which was a
nanosecond previously occupied by the mass midpoint of the
star, at the initialisation of its explosion. The force of
the exploding star will subsequently affect every single
planet within the previously balanced and stable solar
system. It will reach for instance two equidistant planets
from the star precisely at the same time, and would affect
them in precisely the same manner. However, if both
considered planets are not equal in mass, size, shape, and
composition, the impact, level of acceleration, and the new
resultant final velocity of each planet will differ
accordingly. It is necessary to consider that prior to any
change in a stable solar system, each planet has two
velocities, one of progression in orbit, and one of rotation
about its own axis. The latter also includes variation of
angle of rotation, or (“wobble”). Both of these are subject
to change during the sudden death of a star and the changes
will be dependent on many factors, not least the velocities
inherent in the stable origins of the system. When taking
into consideration an example of two planets of unequal
mass, size, shape, and respective distance from the star, it
is obvious that each will be affected by the force of the
exploding star at different times, by a resultant sum of
forces attributed to each single vector with point of origin
in the mid of the star mass, and distributed gradually in
varying strengths over the facing half side of the planet,
beginning with the precise moment in time when the first
force vector impacts with the midpoint of the planet’s
facial surface. Providing that this force vector/s has not
been distorted on its way by another celestial object. The
combined resultant force acting on a planet causing
acceleration will also depend on respective size, and mass
and the planet’s final velocity will also differ
accordingly. However, it must be clearly stated that while
disputing, like many before me, Newton’s calculation on
effect of removal of the force of Gravity, strict attention
must be paid to his Laws of Motion, which I consider to be
unquestionably correct.
The, so far
ignored, force of the exploding star will cause a planet to
leave its orbital position once an opposing equality has
been achieved between itself and the force of Gravity. A
planet will therefore leave its stellar orbit at a specific
degree determined by period lapsed from the moment in time
the explosion begun until the moment in time when equality
between the two forces is reached, resulting in a change in
direction following the resultant force vector (Vr), which
is calculated from the two primary force vectors. One of
these is represented by the force vector equal to the force
of Gravity, which was affecting the planet in its previous
orbit. The second one is the force vector equal to the
energy released by the force of the exploding star. The
first is a tangent force vector with point of origin placed
on the previous orbit of the planet, and the second is an
outward pointing force vector linking the mass midpoint of
the, now exploded, star and the mass midpoint of the
respective planet. Supposing therefore for the purpose of a
simplified example that the primary vector (Vg) = 70 units,
whilst the second primary vector (Vf) = 100 units, then the
planet will be affected by a resultant directional force
acting along the resulting vector (Vr) = 122.066 units. The
planet’s final new direction through space will therefore
follow the path of (Vr) and will be affected by a resultant
combined force equal to 122,066 units. It is therefore
absolutely clear that once the gravitational balance of any
solar system is terminated by a “removal” of its star, a
planet previously positioned in stable orbit, due to
Gravity, will not follow the suggested directional path
according to Isaac Newton’s law, nor will it follow the path
implied by Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity.
Furthermore, no planet under these circumstances will be
affected solely by the force equal to Gravity, but obviously
by a combined resultant force derived from the force of
Gravity and the force equal to the energy released by the
exploding star.
TOP
